Antibacterial Activity of Bixa orellana Compared with Camellia sinensis Against Streptococcus mutans: An In Vitro Comparative Study

View/ Open
Descargar
(application/pdf: 315.0Kb)
(application/pdf: 315.0Kb)
Date
2023-04-28Author(s)
Granados-Jamanca, Lindsay
Medrano-Colmenares, Sara Mercedes
Gamboa-Alvarado, Eloy
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela
Castañeda-Pérez, Luz
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Adolfo
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cayo‑Rojas, César Félix
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Aim: Bixa orellana and Camellia sinensis are plant species cultivated in several South American countries such as Peru and used to combat diseases due to their antimicrobial properties. The aim of this study was to assess the antibacterial activity of the methanolic extract of B. orellana compared with the ethanolic extract of C. sinensis against Streptococcus mutans at 24, 48, and 72h. Materials and Methods: This in vitro and longitudinal experimental study had a sample of 12 wells per group. The antibacterial activity was assessed at concentrations of 1000mg/mL (100%), 750mg/mL (75%), and 500mg/mL (50%), by the well diffusion method on
Müller Hinton Agar in two stages. In first stage, antibacterial activity of ethanolic extract of C. sinensis and methanolic extract of B. orellana was determined. In second stage, concentrations of both extracts with higher antibacterial activity were compared using 0.12% chlorhexidine as a control. In addition, antibacterial sensitivity was assessed according to Duraffourd’s scale and the minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentration (MIC and MBC) was determined. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskall Wallis test and ANOVA test of one factor inter-group and intra-group with Tukey and Bonferroni post hoc, considering a significance level
of 5%. Results: In first stage, ethanolic extract of C. sinensis (100% and 75%) and methanolic extract of B. orellana (100% and 75%) showed higher antibacterial activity against S. mutans at 48h (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). In second stage, at 48h, highly sensitive activity was observed against C. sinensis (100% and 75%) and B. orellana at 100%. In addition, C. sinensis at 100% and 75% showed significantly higher antibacterial activity against S. mutans compared with B. orellana (P < 0.05) and chlorhexidine (P <
0.05). Likewise, a significant increase in antibacterial activity could be observed in all concentrations at 48h (P < 0.001), decreasing significantly in all groups at 72h (P < 0.001). The MIC of the ethanolic extract of C. sinensis was 250mg/mL and the MBC was 500mg/mL. In the methanolic extract of B. orellana the MIC was 125mg/mL and the MBC was 500mg/mL. Conclusion: Ethanolic extract of C. sinensis and methanolic extract of B. orellana, both at 100% concentration, presented their highest antibacterial activity against S. mutans at 48h, with C. sinensis more effective compared with B. orellana. However, this antibacterial effect decreased in
both extracts at 72h. The MBC of C. sinensis and B. orellana against S. mutans was 500mg/mL for both extracts, whereas the MIC was 250mg/mL and 125mg/mL, respectively, for both extracts.