Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAlacote-Mauricio, Brian
dc.contributor.authorGihuaña-Aguilar, Cindy
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Ramírez, Leonor
dc.contributor.authorCervantes-Ganoza, Luis
dc.contributor.authorLadera-Castañeda, Marysela
dc.contributor.authorDapello-Zevallos, Giannina
dc.contributor.authorCayo‑Rojas, César
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T19:20:20Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T19:20:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-31
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14308/4950
dc.description.abstractAim: Discoloration in ionomeric materials occurs by absorption of substances, so color stability is important because these materials are of choice to restore class V. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the color stability of a giomer, a conventional glass ionomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer exposed to different beverages with different immersion times. Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental and longitudinal study had 135 discs were sampled in total (2mm thick × 8mm in diameter) distributed in three equal groups (n = 45): Beautifil II, Vitremer, and Ketac Universal. Each group was divided into three equal subgroups (n = 15 each group) and immersed in three different staining solutions: coffee, Coca-Cola®, and red wine. Color change was recorded with the Vita Easyshade® spectrophotometer after 1h, 24h, and 1 week of immersion. Measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated. Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman nonparametric H tests were used to compare independent measures. The Bonferroni post hoc was used considering a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: Beautifil II (P <0.05) and Ketac Universal (P < 0.05) showed significant differences with respect to color variation (ΔE) when comparing exposure to Coca-Cola® versus exposure to coffee and red wine for 1h, 24h, and 1 week. Vitremer showed no significant differences when exposed to Coca-Cola®, coffee, and red wine for 1h, 24h, and 1 week (P = 0.607, P = 0.276, and P = 0.134, sequentially). All three restorative materials, after 1 hour immersed in CocaCola®, showed ΔE < 3.3 and Beautifil II obtained ΔE = 3.12 after 24h immersed in the same beverage. Conclusion: Coffee and red wine significantly varied the color of Beautifil II and Ketac Universal over time. Beautifil II and Ketac Universal showed significantly more pigmentation with red wine and less with Coca-Cola® at 1 week immersion. Vitremer showed no significant differences when exposed to Coca-Cola®, coffee, and red wine at all times tested. There were clinically acceptable variations for all three restorative materials immersed in Coca-Cola for 1h. This clinical threshold was only maintained for the Beautifil II giomer up to 24h of immersion in the same beverage.es_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherJournal of International Oral Healthes_PE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_PE
dc.subjectVariación de colores_PE
dc.subjectEstudio comparativoes_PE
dc.subjectMateriales dentaleses_PE
dc.subjectOdontologíaes_PE
dc.subjectGiómeroes_PE
dc.subjectIonómeroes_PE
dc.titleColor stability in a giomer, a conventional glass ionomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer exposed to different pigment beverages: An in vitro comparative studyes_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14es_PE
dc.publisher.countryUSes_PE


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem